Here comes India’s first competitive match of the tournament, and it’s against a team that was saying a lot of things before they got whipped by Australia. England still doesn’t know what its strongest side is, and what their order should be, and maybe that’s preventing them from being as good as they’re capable of being. The Castrol Index doesn’t rate England&#...
England’s side of the ratings, which were a lot easier to do. If only I could rate them by the quality of their tweets.
9.5 - Stuart Broad (182 runs @60.66 and 25 wickets @13.84): Close to being dropped. Fuller lengths. Vital lower-order runs. Near-perfect series. Next Botham. Yawn, you know the whole story because everyone’s already harped about it. It’s a fairy tale all right...
Another match; another couple of fake reports about real games, credited to fake people whose given names have no express intention on our side to indicate real peopleThis report comes from Real Sunil Gavaskar and Real Michael Atherton.Report from "Real Sunil Gavaskar"For decades now, people remember my 36* from 60 overs in the 1975 World Cup and greet me with a mixture of secret admiration (mostl...
In the ongoing test series between India and England, the rub of the green often went against the Indians - few instances noted below:Zaheer Khan was ruled out of the first test at Lords due to injury - this reduced to the Indian bowling attack to three bowlers (one of them being an out-of-form 400+ wicket-taking spinner) and occasional captain-bowler. This was felt sorely when the English team (s...
9
11
Views:
97
No comments so far...