Poor Nathan

Votes:
Vote Up 6
 
Vote Down 4
    Views:
186
Indexed  December 13, 2010

NWG rarely feels sorry for anyone other than Matthew Hoggard (and Ryan Sidebottom’s wife), but poor Nathan Hauritz has flogged his cricket stuff outside his flat.What has the guy done to deserve this? Why has someone who has only played cricket for a couple of days be better than him?Bad form Australia. See the complete post here

Mentions: Australia    Nathan Hauritz   
Posted by:
The Nightwatchgirl™
- view other posts - visit this blog

No comments so far...

Leave a comment about this post

Related Posts

Nathan Hauritz – Number One Australian Spinner

- October 13, 2010
Shane Warne said that Nathan Hauritz was being given a crap field by Ricky Ponting today. Being as Hauritz went for 76 in 12 overs on a fifth day Indian pitch, we’d guess that Ponting was only using four or five fielders. Hauritz is currently said to be Australia’s number one spinner. Quite apart from the [...]

Nathan Hauritz Gets The Boot - Australian Selectors And Spinners

- November 21, 2010
We wrote about how Australia’s selectors don’t know what they’re doing last week. Nowhere is this more apparent than when it comes to spin bowlers. Spoilt by Warne and MacGill for so long, there seems to be a ‘grass is greener’ philosophy, even when the grass in manifestly not greener, it’s actually just the odd yellowing [...]

Australian Ashes Squad Named

- June 13, 2009
We’re less than 50 days away from the Ashes and Australia have named their touring squad. Here is my pick of the top XI batting order plus the second fiddles: Phillip Hughes Simon Katich Ricky Ponting Michael Clarke Michael Hussey (demoted one spot due to lack of form) Marcus North Brad Haddin Mitchell Johnson Brett Lee Peter Siddle Stuart Clark And the other guys left to carry the kit bag...

England Celebrate - They’re Slightly Better Than Half As Good As Australia

- July 12, 2009
Okay, saying England is half as good as Australia is an exageration. After all, Australia only lost 6 wickets to England’s 19. So mathematically, England were only slightly better than 30% of Australia’s effort. Let’s be generous and round it up to 33%. England are a third as good as Australia. Still, I am gutted we didn’t get the win. A 1-nil scorecard would’ve been ...